you decide.... circumcised or uncircumcised?

I love being with an uncircumcised man, something very natural about it and I swear an uncircumcised cock will hit my g-spot much easier then a circumcised one, but either is fine, although if I had a son, I would not have him circumcised, it just seems barbaric these days. How hard is it to push the skin back and clean??

Give me Mr. Uncut, please! Once you've had intact, you'll never go back. :D

It would seem to me ...with uncut... you get the best of both worlds... being cut... I wish i were uncut... having two sons... I could not see any reason to have them cut.. .at all...

You know, I thought I'd have an opinion on it, but I really don't. A cock is a cock, as long as it's clean and hard I'm happy!

Either...both look delectable but I agree 100% with eleni223, uncircumsied simply becoz that little 'extra' bit of skin really hits all the right spots especially my G spot...!

Ok I am uncircumcised and for some reason I am really embarrassed about it. But after reading your posts from women saying they like guys who are uncut gives me a boost of confidence. I really don't see what the problem is every guy was uncircumcised onces in there life, your born that way. Why try to change something that your born with? Like I said everyone is born like that. And another thing is I really don't see much of a difference because when I put a condom on or when I am hard the skin rolls back its self making it look cut. So really I don't know why people sometimes make such a big fuss about it when it rolls back its self. And for cleaning if you don't clean it yes it will smell but you must be pretty lazy to not clean it, it takes about 3 seconds to clean, very simple. Plus I do agree girls like the extra skin because it will hit a girls g-spot over and over again driving them crazy. And I love when I girl just plays with the extra skin either with her fingers or with her tongue it feels amazing.

But thanks for making me feel unembarrassed.
DT

i am circumcised. For a while i hated being circumcised. i grew up and now i love it. Clean tight and last for aages. its beautiful.

First off, I have nothing bad to say about men who are circumcised. They are just as able to be caring lovers who please their partners, and most of my friends and loved ones have had it done, so no bad karma here...

BUT...

WE CAN NOT let this procedure continue. We understand that the foreskin is highly sensitive, it has thousands and thousands of nerve endings similar to those found in the fingertips and lips. We KNOW it has value. It protects the head, keeping it moist and sensitive, and warm. It protects the urethra (which is also the reproductive tract opening) from damage. Meatal Stenosis is a fairly common condition, and only occurs in circumcised men - its a scarring of the urethral opening.

The foreskin itself is mobile and aids sexual activity, whether solo or with partners. This benefits both the owner and his partners, keeping sex wetter and more fluid.

Some say the lack of sensitivity is good because it allows them to last longer.. well the foreskin is a different kind of sensitivty than that the ones that bring about orgasm. There are many other factors that have to do with how long someone lasts.

There are better ways to last longer, such as kegel excercises. I know that if a man puts his mind to it, he can develop the muscles to learn how to control himself, and I think thats a much better way to do things.

To conclude, If there is one thing I know as a fact, it is that when its not an immediate medical emergency, foreskin amputation should NEVER EVER EVER be the choice of anyone BUT the person who owns the penis in question. It should never be a parent's choice.

What other healthy, normal body part besides the foreskin, especially one with thousands and thousands of sensitive nerve endings, or from the genitals, can a parent permanently remove from their children for any reason they please? none.

Joel.

P.S. Lets come up with a term better than uncircumcised. By using such a term, it becomes IMPOSSIBLE to talk about a natural penis without bringing up the topic of circumcision. WHAT a culture we live in!

----------------------------

23 - M - Critical Relativist and Feminist (Equalist) - Canada

For thousands of posts on this issue, go to:

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/sex

then search "foreskin" or "uncircumcised". Discover for yourself how young Americans are becoming more foreskin friendly.

The pictures above don't quite do justice to the difference. Most men look almost alike when they are erect. The foreskin is prominent only when flaccid. And no photograph can truly do justice to the way a foreskin moves, which is the hottest thing about it.

Being a circumcised male, as soon as I heard I wasn't as sensitive as someone who hadn't had that done, I was jealous. It also doesn't help to hear that some girls like it that much more.

That being said. I still like my penis a lot. I'm not afraid to show it, and as long as I can please a woman fully I've got no issue with it.

Might, I think thats a very respectable view to have... I don't think casting blame or becoming depressed is the right way to deal with this sort of issue - so I respect that you've noticed that what counts is that you can use it and love it still.

However, I think whats important to note is that we must NOT carry this on to our children. This practice MUST end.

-------------------------------------

23 - M - Critical Relativist and Feminist (Equalist) - Canada

Here's mine:
http://dodsonandross.com/art/my-foreskin

Nothin' special but part of the growing uncut alliance...

Cut or uncut, the most important aspect of fucking comes from between your lover's ears-- his or her brain and the level of ability he or she uses to seduce you. Fucking is not just physical, I could care less if a man is cut or uncut. I want a man who mentally can fuck me silly.

Uncircumcised is a silly term - it implies that circumcised is the default. Ridiculous. Give me a natural, uncut, intact, whole penis any day over a mutilated one. Soooo much better. In fact, oddly enough with living in the U.S., my first ever sex partner was intact. I was a bit spoiled by that I suppose. I was surprised, after we broke up, at how different sex was with circumcised men. I actually thought I was pregnant (spot bleeding) when in fact it was just that the rough, keratinized, unsheathed penis of my new partner had scrapped my insides, creating small tears! Unfortunately, it is difficult to find an intact man here in the U.S. and I ended up marrying a cut one. I am currently trying to convince him to do foreskin restoration. Even that, though, would just make sex better for me and slightly better for him (he would gain back the sensitivity in his glans and not lose it and become impotent later in life) - it could never bring back the joy there is in stimulating the foreskin of the man who owns it. It is SO much different than stimulating a continuously keratinizing penis head - and it is so much better. Other's comments above are absolutely right. We MUST NOT circumcise our sons (I have a daughter, but if I do one day have a son I would NEVER have him cut) unless there is an extremely compelling medical reason to do so - end even then, only after we have had at least one second opinion!

To the guy who posted about his insecurities on being whole: http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ . You do not have to read the whole thing: just the last section titled "Discussion" - it will tell you the results of the study. Don't worry, and laugh at any woman who rejects you for being intact. She is mistaken, and is the one missing out.

Whenever I see an uncircumsized cock, I think "dog cock" and it's a real turn OFF for me.  I'm not putting down uncircumsized men, just saying that they turn me off big time.  Nothing I can do about it.  Nothing they can do about it.  That's just the way it is.  Vive le difference I guess.  BTW, my guy is circumsized and I love his cock.

I agree with several of the other comments on here that a penis is a penis. I like 'em both ways! I have never noticed any difference in how they feel, I have not had a lover who was "more sensitive" because he was uncircumsized. I do like to play with the foreskin during oral sex, but that's no reason for me to like that better. Frankly, it's a bit of a distraction sometimes! I can go either way, it's all great.

HMMMM I not circumcisd But yet my foreskin dose not cover the head of my penis! When i was about 10 years old i was interested in pulling the foreskin back, the skin was still intact to the base of the head or the rige.... Then over time i found by pulling back too far the foreskin was letting go around the rige, bit by bit over time... After that my dick looked like i was circumcised, the foreskin could be pulled back fully! And since then that's the way it stayed! Most women beleive that i am circumcised but have a hard time telling them that im not! I still have foreskin that can fully cover back over the head! but not when it's  erected, cause the skin rolls back! Now that im in the 40's i have got used to having the foreskin fully coverd. So it's good thing that im both uncircumcised and circumcised!! Best of both worlds. I never had any problems with my foreskin guess im lucky!

Coldnsteelpa...

I'like to add that to me circumcision is the exception.

I am from Europe and I never had a circumcised lover. So, i guess the norm is different here. I first realized that when in one episode if SATC the clique was discussing "uncircumcised" penises as smth really exotic. That seemed so strange, I could imagine the whole conversation about circumcised penises..

It really depends on your point of view. 

(the whole concept of calling a to me natural penis "uncircumcised" really confused me; i guess this term developed when in the u.s. the circumcised penis became the norm - does anyone know why this happened?)

 I was curcumcised at birth. I wish now that I wasn't, but it was not my choice to make. In the 60's it seemed that all males were circumcised. When my son was born we chose to leave him un-cut. My sister-in-law was agast, as she thought he would be made fun of in school and ridiculed as being different. He is now  almost 20 and I asked him about being uncirmcised. He responded that nobody ever made a comment about it and he is glad that he is uncircumcised.

I don't know what the ratio is, but there are a lot more uncircumcised men in their young 20's then when I was in my yound 20's. based on my informal locer room poll

I know some say that its the same. And some people say its different. Today was my first time seeing an uncircumcised penis and i was totally grossed out. I dont know how it would feel good. Yes, with the condom its all the same.. well at some level. I'm saying im going to leave my guy bec of it, but I dont turned on by it and when we are getting hot and bothered i just remember it and get turned off..I guess you can get it removed?? He guess wants to do that..idk much info on that tho.

When men respond this way to women with average-to-larger labia, I just shake my head and think of how shallow and pathetic they are.

And, not suprisingly, I feel the exact same disgust towards your comment. You think a man should have thousands upon thousands of nerve endings removed from his penis because you aren't used to it? Your attitude is VERY anti-sex, and I hope you will re-evaluate your perspective on this subject.

-------------------------------------

23 - M - Critical Relativist and Feminist (Equalist) - Canada

your comment has some merit, but I'd like to point out that the removal of these nerves is not necessarily anti-sex. I have been circumcised from birth, and I don't feel like my sexual pleasure or stimulation is less than that of my uncircumcised friends, according to the encounters we've discussed. Beyond that, one of my friends was uncircumcised and chose to get a circumcision at age 13 because his penis was often overly sensitive and for a few other reasons. He says that he actually began to receive more pleasure from masturbating (at that age he was not sexually active) because the slight reduction in sensitivity enabled him to last longer before reaching orgasm.

In my comment I was specifically reffering to HER comment as anti-sex. That said, I do feel that amputation of healthy, sexually-sensitive tissue is anti-sex as well.

Now, I am not in ANY way trying to tell you that you shouldn't enjoy your penis and sex life. You enjoy the pleasure you feel, and that should not be ignored. However, the foreskin contains high concentrations of fine-touch nerve endings similar to those found in the fingertips and lips. The rest of the penis does not provide a person with these sensations, especially not to the same degree. So, there is NO DOUBT that removing the foreskin removes sensation. The mere fact that there IS sensation in the foreskin is proof enough that that removing it removes sensation.

If a man is over-sensitive, that can be solved by simply touching it, washing it in the shower, and pulling back the foreskin frequently. A very simple and easily solved problem that doesn't require amputation of the foreskin! I know a lot of 13 year old girls who'd probably want plastic surgery done on their bodies, especially if it was because of something that made them feel different. I don't think a 13 year old is really old enough to make a good decision about something like that.

Studies have not shown that circumcision is an effective way to deal with premature ejaculation. Many men, circumcised and not, suffer from it, and its attributed not to an excess of sensation, but rather a person's state of mind, experience level, and the strength of their PC muscles. The best way to deal with premature ejaculation is to do regular kegel excercises. That way you won't lose sensation, you can still cum fast if you want, but you can also control yourself better, and last longer when you want to. That is really the ideal solution.

-------------------------------------

23 - M - Critical Relativist and Feminist (Equalist) - Canada

My boyfriend has an uncircumcised penis and it is very sensitive during oral sex..i feel bad sometimes cause i can get pretty rough and he says that it hurts when i first saw it i kind of got disgusted but got used to it

I am 20 years old and uncut untill today i had not done much research on this subject and was very shy of my "uncutness" howewver the more i read the more i feel better about myself i am just so nervous that when the moment comes she will laugh scream and run it is something no one knows about me and after researching it im beginning not to care what anyone thinks however i would still like to hear from the ladies especially the ladies from the USA and what they think on the matter

I have an uncut cock and have never had a problem with it. Of course I have to be more particular with hygene, but then who doesn't. My gf prefers an uncut cock and she certainly likes mine, but having said that we both think it looks more attractive when erect and with the foreskin peeled back over the head as is shown in my photographs. That is the only thing I have against foreskin, it does nothing to enhance the beauty of an erect cock which is why I refuse to have mine photographed with the head covered up. I always roll it back to expose the head.

Circumcised! They are so much cleaner and better looking. They have big pink heads that show all the time and I just want to kiss them And they feel better in sex.

OK. I have never been with an uncircumsized man, and I prefer to know if a guy I am dating is cut or uncut as soon as possible and BEFORE I have any contact with it. If a guy didn't tell me and I ended up being intimate with him and found out he was UNcut, I'd leave. I definitely wouldn't continue dating him. I think that needs to be something someone knows upfront, like if you're a transexual. I personally LOVE watching my significant other walking around nude, and I literally gag when I see a flacid uncircumsized penis. I've thrown up before too. And to make it worse, they're usually crusty and men who I've known are UNcircumsized scratch themselves a LOT MORE than men who are circumsized. I have a LOT of problems with ANY man's cleanliness  in general, just being men. Men are known as a stereotype for not being the most hygenic of the sexes... that whole wearing their underwear twice by turning inside out is a stereotype for a reason. So no thanks.

I also just don't UNDERSTAND how an uncut works during sex, hand jobs, etc. Yeah, the foreskin pulls down off the head when it's erect, but the skin IS attached to the shaft, right? So, when you're plowing away, how does that little piece that holds the whole thing onto your shaft NOT get ripped off? I just don't understand how it works. It is WAY too complicated and too many places for extra bacteria and gunk to hang out.

I also have babysat PLENTY of small boys, some cut and some uncut and I noticed that the uncircumsized ones were playing with themselves ALL THE TIME. I'm sorry, but I don't want my little boys walking around playing with their cocks all the time. Men don't seem to need any more sensititivy in my opinion either. They're plenty sensitive enough.

And aside from all of that, a CUT cock is just SO much more attractive. I don't know.... just my preference. They DO look different - yes even when erect - so I prefer a cleaner, simpler look, which is CUT.

I am a male with a circumcised penis. I love my penis but would love to have had the chance to choose. I think an uncircumcised penis is beautiful if there is not too much skin. I love the smell and taste of a clean uncut penis. If a guy is not clean I refuse to suck him, but that has only happened once, most guys I've met keep themselves clean. An uncut penis feels nice too. I guess when you get right down to it both are nice but i lean toward having fun with an uncircumcised penis.

so, your entire post is litered with absurd comments, like comparing a man with a natural penis to a transexual, and suggesting uncircumcised men scratch themselves more. It is definitely clear that you don't know what you are talking about through most of the post. You've never been with a guy with a foreskin, yet you have all kinds of ideas about what you don't like about them.

That said, you are TOTALLY free to have whatever preference you want, but don't think that judging someone based on those merits isn't completely superficial and anti-sex. Because that is EXACTLY what it is. I feel bad for anyone who would consider dating a girl with opinions similar to your own.

-------------------------------------

23 - M - Critical Relativist and Feminist (Equalist) - Canada