D&R Recommends
The Recession Effect: Gender Balance in the Workplace

It's hard to know the WHY behind these numbers but it is an interesting discussion on gender, money, and power. The terrible bottom line of last Friday's job report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics did not surprise many people - there were many fewer jobs in December 2008 than in the previous month.
Much less noticed, however, was Friday's breakdown by sex of employment declines before December. Is it possible that one legacy of this recession is that women become a majority of the work force for the first time in American history?
Years ago, women were a small percentage of the work force (outside the home). During much of the 20th century - especially the 1970s and 1980s - women's share of the labor force increased. By 1990, the work force was 47 percent female and 53 percent male, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Many view this as one of the most important and desirable social and economic transformations of our lifetimes.
Throughout the 1990s and 2000s, and until this recession, women remained less than 49 percent of the work force. However, that percentage has now passed 49 percent and may cross the 50 percent threshold for the first time.
In November 2008, the female work force shrank more in percentage terms than it ever has in any one month - and more than ever over any single year - since 1964, if not longer. Nevertheless, the drop in the number of women working so far in this recession is smaller than the decline for men - even when measured in percentage terms - as has been the case in previous recessions.
There have been three distinct recessions - 1990-91, 2001 and today. According to the National Bureau of Economic Research, the recessions began in July 1990, March 2001 and December 2007. The first two ended in March 1991 and November 2001. Two notes: First, nobody knows when this recession will end, and second, the most recent data for which the the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports employment by sex is November 2008.
During the first recession, male employment fell 2.0 percent, while female employment hardly fell at all (less than 0.05 percent). In the other two recessions, the percentage employment loss for men exceeded that for women by a factor of 3 to 5 (interestingly, although women still have a small minority of each recession's employment decline, the female share of the decline has increased from one recession to the next, indicating that jobs held by women have become more sensitive to changes in the business cycle).
As a result of the larger male jobs losses, women's share of the work force has increased 0.5 percentage points in each of the most recent recessions. For example, the 0.5 percentage point increase that occurred in the 8 months of the 1990-91 recession is more than occurred for the 10 years that followed, or in the 6 years that followed the 2001 recession.
If the pundits are right that this recession will be long and severe, then women may gain the 0.9 percentage points from November 2008 that would push them past the 50 percent milestone. Important milestones will remain to be achieved, but women's surpassing 50 percent of employment is something that historians will note for years to come. [Econmix]
Topics at D&R
» Anal Play (20)
» Betty's Memoir (62)
» Body Image (34)
» Breasts (13)
» Clitoris (43)
» Culture (87)
» Disability & Sex (17)
» Drugs & Sex (8)
» Erotica (61)
» Fan Mail (5)
» Fantasy (22)
» Female Ejaculation (17)
» Feminism (85)
» Fetish/Kink (43)
» G-Spot (10)
» Health & Wellness (18)
» Intercourse (2)
» Labia (15)
» Masturbation (77)
» Menopause (21)
» Menstruation (4)
» Oral Sex (19)
» Orgasm & Pleasure (89)
» Pelvic Floor Muscle (12)
» Penis & Prostate (54)
» Pornography (30)
» Pregnancy & Motherhood (18)
» Relationships (46)
» Safe Sex (33)
» Sex Education (36)
» Sex Positions (9)
» Sex Work (21)
» Sexual Desire (33)
» Sexual Identity/Orientation (38)
» Transgender/Transexual (6)
» Vibrators & Sex Toys (51)
» Virginity & First Penetration Sex (29)
» Vulva & Vagina (75)
Newsletter
Stay informed on our latest news!
Your Opinion
D&R Podcast
Get notified when we add a new podcast to the site.
Betty Dodson Online with Carlin Ross is dedicated to providing sex education, information, and entertainment to support people's health and happiness through sexual expression and female masturbation.
— DodsonAndRoss.com
Liberating Women One Orgasm at a Time.
» Find out more.


Technorati Tags: 

Very interesting article.
Very interesting article. Thanks
Good and maybe not.
While I am excited at the prospect that women are gaining as a percent of those in the paid labor force, I wonder if this is as good as it sounds. Occupations traditionally held by males have been more highly compensated in our society. If there is a decline in the number of men working is that an indication that higher paying jobs are disappearing? If women merely account for a higher percentage of those who participate in the paid labor force without also gaining in terms of compensation I'm a bit more reserved in my excitement about this.
I guess what I'm saying, in a round-about way, is that it is not enough for women to be employed as frequently as men, women also need to be paid just as much as men. We need to re-examine how we value work.
I stumbled on this post
I stumbled on this post from another blog and just had some thoughts. I agree with Enrico that I am not sure if this is something to get excited about or not. On the surface, I say its great - if women want to work, they can and its great that they are finding employment. Deeper down though, I really want to see breakdowns of the type of work they are getting. Look at it this way, would you applaud a restuarant where 90% of the workers are female if the breakdown is that all the men are the managers and the women are the "lower level" employees? Just because there are more of the lower level positions doesn't mean things are any better for the women. I would also want to see if the women who are taking jobs now really have any desire to be in the workplace. If this economy forcing mothers who would rather stay home into taking a job? If so, then I think we will see the numbers flip back around after the recession is over.
Pretty Even
I still think that 49 percent is pretty darn even. It proves the old saying that women should stay home with the kids while the men work wrong. As I still see a lot of families where that is the case. My mom never worked when she was raising me while my dad was working full time.
Well, I dont think that
Well, I dont think that recession has such a huge effect on everybody.
It really shows what the
It really shows what the future is in store for us. I still think it will be about 10-20 years before we seen a increase in women at higher white collar jobs though.
Great
This post is interesting thanks for posting. I think everybody should work evenly or men should be home more withkids.
This trend is happening in
This trend is happening in wealthy countries all over the world. As the US shifts from manufacturing jobs to service jobs women are taking over the workplace. Far more men have lost their jobs in this recession than have women.
In November 2008, the female
In November 2008, the female work force shrank more in percentage terms than it ever has in any one month - and more than ever over any single year - since 1964, if not longer. Nevertheless, the drop in the number of women working so far in this recession is smaller than the decline for men - even when measured in percentage terms - as has been the case in previous recessions. Isnt this interesting?
Yeah. Women are now becoming
Yeah. Women are now becoming a new breed to be reckoned with in the country these days. However, how about in developing nations, is the ration about the same?
Thanks a lot folks.
Thanks a lot folks.
Women are becoming more
Women are becoming more aggressive and more skillful these days. Men should keep a watchful eye on them, I guess. The macho days are over.
Step in the right direction...
I agree that this is a step in the right direction and an encouraging trend, but I also agree with some of the earlier commenters that the type of role these women are getting is also important. I fear the number of women in powerful positions may still be pretty low.
great news
this is good news for all women :)
Ixus
Good news for women?
Good news for women? I don't think so. The recession is bad always.
I didnot think i can find a
I didnot think i can find a well writen post like that by searching randomly in google
That is a very intersting
That is a very intersting article
I like it
this is good news for all
this is good news for all women.Very interesting article. Thanks
greate
I love this news.Thanks for share.
Where do you get this
Where do you get this information that more men are losing their jobs than women? Perhaps it is because a lot of the jobs being lost are not leading edge, in technology, environmental, etc... but along the lines of manufacturing and jobs that are slowly being replaced with advancements being made.
I'm not sure what the
I'm not sure what the significance of this data is supposed to be, if anything at all. Sorry, I just don't see how breaking down employment rates by gender is a good indication of anything in today's real world.
Post new comment