Why is Everyone Scared of STIs?

Wed, 11/16/2011 - 15:56
Submitted by Betty Dodson

Hi Dr. Betty,

First off (and I know you've heard this from me a million times before): love the site, love the work you are doing, and you are absolutely my #1 sex guru forever. I turn to you again for advice on a situation I am finding particularly difficult in my life right now.

I run around a lot in an open, polyamorous, sex-positive community, but I have a problem with the way most people in this community view STIs and treat them as a topic of discussion. There is a lot of fear about them, a lot of blaming, and a lot of shaming. Very few people, that I know, have ever gotten an STI in this community. But it is a constant issue for everyone. Oddly enough, most of the fear seems to focus on genital herpes, and not HIV or AIDs. Personally, I feel that both are currently not something to worry about the way I see others worrying about them and discussing them, but I do understand not wanting to get herpes or HIV, as they would both be with you for the rest of your life.

However, as a self-proclaimed sex-positive radical, I often find myself in a position of trying to dispel this fear, call people out on their slut-shaming and STI-phobic ideas, and work for the rights of those who are STI positive to continue to live a sexual life with those who have not tested positive. No matter how much I advocate, how many different approaches to the topic I take, I often find myself all alone in my philosophy on this. Even my closest partners and lovers, and most respected friends, disagree with me that STIs are not something to worry about if you want to live a truly sex positive life.

To me, it seems as though the choice to be poly/ open/ non-monogamous brings with it a certain level of risk. I would argue not much more risk than monogamy, but that could be a whole different rant so I won't go into it. Sure, you can try to cut down on the risk by getting tested, using protection, communicating. But I think, one way or another, many of us will end up with STIs of one type or another eventually. And I really feel like that should be OK. I don't see what the big deal is. No one wants to catch a cold, but we all do, right? And frequently. I argue that the only reason people have so much fear surrounding these is because of their fear of sexual death within this and other sexually open communities, and the only way to combat that is to truly believe that it is no big deal. And to continue with business as usual when someone does come down with something.

This point of view has painted me into an uncomfortable place. One where pretty much no one agrees with me, and one where my peers view me as a possible risk to the health of the community. As one of the few people I have ever heard/ read who has similar views to me on this topic, I ask you: how can I talk some sense into these otherwise sex-positive radicals? Because I clearly have not been doing it the right way so far.

Thanks and keep up the good work. You inspire me to stay radical.

Dear C,

I always appreciate your comments on D&R. And I understand your frustration about all the unnecessary fear surrounding STI's. Fear is the current motivator used by our sick government. And of course Big Pharma jumps on the band wagon to sell more of their useless and often harmful drugs.

I went through the sixties sexual revolution on throughout the seventies without any serious threat to my health. At the end of seventies I had my first Herpes out break. Back then, we felt sorry for anyone who never had Herpes because it meant they weren't having much sex. It was treated the same as we view a cold sore on someone's mouth. During an outbreak you didn't kiss. We applied the same principal to genital Herpes: During an outbreak you didn't fuck.

We act as though we don't have immune systems that work to keep us healthy. Part of our health includes our mental attitude and that's what you are complaining about. People who constantly get sick in many ways seem to plan on it. We need to factor in our mental state as well as our physical bodies. It's my opinion that people who focus on STI's use it as an excuse to avoid sexual situations that make them uncomfortable. I must say I'm surprised to hear this is such a big issue in your polyamorous, sex-positive community. Since fear is the primary emotion of our age, perhaps this new global revolution will begin to replace fear with freedom to enjoy our lives. Meanwhile, continue to be the voice of reason and know that you are not alone.

Dr. Betty

Liberating women one orgasm at a time

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Why? How about because they can harm your health?.....

Wed, 11/16/2011 - 20:36
MissM (not verified)

This post makes me livid....but: when you play...play safe, be responsible and be smart. Some STI's, if left untreated, lead to pelvic infections which can hurt your fertility. And of course, HIV can lead to full-blown AIDS which, as we all know, can be fatal. Stay open-minded and progressive, but please be safe. No fuck is worth your health or your life. (Or that of your partners'.)

Why are people afraid of STD's?

Wed, 11/16/2011 - 22:02

Well, I've seen a skeletal AIDS patient that I doubted would live to make his one week follow up (thankfully I was wrong!). But while there are quite a few HIV patients who are healthy with no medications, there are also many who need the medications to live. The long term effects of antiretrovirals are not pleasant, lipodystrophy, higher cholesterol name a few.
I've also seen herpes outbreaks that were so bad that people had to be hospitalized in order to get IV fluids because their mouths were so full of sores that they couldn't swallow. Granted, we tend to see the bad outbreaks of HSV and there are many people who just have the occasional outbreak or cold sore. (One thing I've learned is that HSV is very prevalent and generally not much of a big deal for most people.)
Syphilis is another STD I wouldn't want to catch. The penicillin shots alone give me pause (and I'm the one so far who has been giving the injections) and I've seen people suffering the effects of neurosyphilis (that requires a spinal tap for a definitive diagnosis-quite a few patients just opt for the shots).
However, my job also provides me with enough incentive to try to eat right and exercise, the self inflicted damage caused by obesity and all the conditions that go with it (diabetes, skin infections, vascular disease).
There needs to be common sense and proper precautions when dealing with anything. Some of my patients marvel at how I never develop any infections especially when dealing with horrific wounds. My secret is simple, I wash my hands a lot, avoid touching my eyes, nose, and mouth, and wear gloves when dealing with broken skin or giving injections.
You do bring up a good point about shaming. The latest issue of Positively Aware sitting in our exam rooms has an article about that. We have many patients who come to us from other counties because they don't want people to know they have HIV/AIDS. These people are having sex which I think is their right as adults, everyone has a right to consensual sex. However they also have a responsibility to not spread the infections to others (that is even true if both partners have HIV-they could have different strains of the virus that could wreak havoc on each other).
My fears would be for (in order of what I don't want to get) HIV, HPV (even though the virus does not lie dormant and will be removed if the wart is removed, there is the possibility of cancer), Hepatitis C (unlike A and B, there is no vaccine for C and the drug regimens sound worse than HIV), syphilis and HSV (although I wouldn't be surprised if I have HSV).
Another point that C brings up that I see at work are the people who don't believe they don't have a STD. Some people just think they definitely have ___________. Of course I also take phone calls from people who are convinced they have diseases not available in the United States (and no, they didn't travel to the country this would actually be found in). So there is a lot of fear about getting diseases in general, not just STD's.

Misjudging risk

Wed, 11/16/2011 - 23:50

Heylin, how does the risk of getting an STI compare to the risk of being severely injured in a road accident, which is about 1 person per thousand per year (thats 1 person per hundred over 10 years). There 30,000 people being killed per year on the roads in the USA and about 18,000 of AIDS but we mostly all just go out and drive, and following the road rules helps keep us out of trouble but not entirely. My feeling is that C is trying to get her community to stop giving undue attention and alarm to the STI issue. Yes, it is a risk. No its not as risky as the roads, and no way as risky as heart disease, which most of us ignore altogether!

Well Fondcare because I ride

Thu, 11/17/2011 - 13:23

Well Fondcare because I ride a bicycle everywhere in a small town usually on the deserted pavements, over the last 6 years the amount of times my friends or aquantances are injured in car crashes has actually out numbered the times I've actualy been in a car. Which has left my subconscious a little car phobic. I think they're amazingly dangerous.

I think the low risk sexual activities are totally poly and as the activity gets more and more risky that activity is placed more and more in the monogamous zone. To name a few I would say Clitoral stimulation is totally free love poly. Intercourse is between trusted partners and blood play is monogamous. 

To remove ambiguity and establish social trust, Be nice if each risk level had it's own name and scene. If you went to a club where say the scene is gay male mutual masterbation. Everyone would know where they stand with no complicated and lengthy discussions just flirting and sex. 

Misinformation

Thu, 11/17/2011 - 19:22
Nicole24 (not verified)

People are afraid because of how STI's and STD's are treated by sex educators in schools, hollywood, and the media. When I was in highschool they told us all these stories about how horrible getting a disease would be, but never said anything about if they were curable/treatable. Also the news and hollywood like to blow things way out of proportion. If you get "infected" it's always with some rare, horrible strain of aids that kills in 1 hour or 3 episodes.

Fondcare

Thu, 11/17/2011 - 22:26

My perspective might be a little different because I work at a doctor's office so I see lots of HIV patients. Only one of them has stated that catching HIV was no big deal, the rest pretty much agree that they would be happier without it. Although one patient recently mentioned that his health has been better since getting the virus (I asked him if it was because he now took better care of his health).  I know where I live there is a lot of HIV and I would not fuck anyone without protection (well, except for my husband and even if I lived somewhere else I'd still use protection). As far as car accidents and heart disease, well, as I mentioned I also see a lot of fallout from obesity and diabetes (that would be more with the wound part of my job and it's been the best motivation for me to sensibly lose weight).
My point is this, it's hard to look at someone and tell they have HIV (well, the lipodystrophy makes it a little easier to spot). The patients who come to my practice cut across all ages, races, sexes, sexuality, etc... So since I can't look at someone and determine whether or not they have a disease which can kill me, my choices are to be safe or not play.
I don't drive without wearing my seat belt. I drive defensively and follow the traffic laws (well, maybe sometimes I exceed the speed limit just a smidge).
I go the the doctor as scheduled and try to do things to improve my health in order to prevent my death from a heart attack from occuring until much later in life, although dying in my sleep in my old age after having a whole bunch of orgasms is my preferred way to go.
I think getting rid of shame is great. But common sense and a little bit of precaution is great as well.

Bicycle safety

Fri, 11/18/2011 - 20:46

Thank Jake E.
I understand your concept but the detail would be difficult. Even clitoral stimulation has multiple definitions - by hand, through clothing, with a vibrator - and the by hand option would need qualified with, for instance, bare fingers or with latex gloves.

Risk assessment

Fri, 11/18/2011 - 20:59

I understand Heylin that when one is involved in an industry one tends to see the problems but they can take on a greater significance than they warrant because we see them every day and we don't assess risk very well compared to other risks. And people use the evidence to emphasise risks, and if they use evidence to emphasise benefits it never makes it to the media pages.
I reckon its very valuable to have insights from someone with your experience on this site but I also think that C (original contributor) has a point about the poly community going over the top about them. But then, perhaps they need to do so to avoid being accused of being soft on sexual health so they are doing so for that reason.
I bet that folk who work in the heart disease area wish that the polys paid more attention to their physical lifestyle!!
All the best H.

Thanks Fondcare

Fri, 11/18/2011 - 22:53

Hey, in my personal experience, working in my field has helped me to lose 20 pounds because of all the diabetic wounds I deal with. If I was still terrified of HIV, I wouldn't work in my field because I administer injections to HIV positive patients who may or may not be on antiretroviral therapy. I just work safe and am prepared to go through the testing/medication protocal if I do have blood/blood contact. Your response to Jake was good, although my nerdy self would advocate the use of nitrile gloves due to the possible of latex allergy in your partner and the fact that nitrile is more resistant to breakout with oil based lubes. I love me some edible oil on my pussy. I will have to lick a nitrile glove so that I can advocate its use in female cunnilingus (Latex tastes yucky). So, living in fear isn't good, being mindful of the risks and taking steps to reduce them are.

It doesn't exist without a name :)

Fri, 11/18/2011 - 23:00

Fondcare I think broadly Sapphic sex is safer than intercourse. Having the risk factors of each catergory fixed in the popular mindspace allows people to say what their risk level is with one word. We can do the same with food when we say we're vegitarian. 

If I call myself vegetarian I don't need to explain to my dinner party host why I can't eat the meat and they respectfully cook me a vegy meal. These words allow us to define our boundaries but our boundaries for sexual safety are at the moment vague. We need a  sexual equivelent of vegitarian and vegan and wheat free. A set of new words and once everyone knows what they mean they'll be on every facebook profile. Yeah just a few new words that allow us to easily state our boundaries and have them respected without having to state them each time at length as if they're kind of concepts we've just invented. 

Sapphic sex needs some guidelines!

Fri, 11/18/2011 - 23:12

I was having the conversation with one of my patients that she still needs to practice safer sex even though she is the giver with oral sex.
But I'm all for handjobs! One of my fantasies during partner sex is that an extra pair of hands was available to touch me. :)

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.